Re: postponing some large patches to 9.2

2011/2/8 Steve Singer <ssinger_pg(at)sympatico(dot)ca>:
> On 11-02-07 10:37 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
>
>> - The PL/python extravaganza.  I'm not really clear where we stand
>> with this.  There are a lot of patches here.
>>
>
> Some of the patches have been committed a few others are ready (or almost
> ready) for a committer.   The table function one  is the only one in
> 'waiting for author'

I didn't quite finished my reviews on pl/python patches yet, but it
seems that "don't remove argument" will be easy to review and unlikely
to have issues. "quote functions" can be committed already as-is.
"table function" should be in if Jan sends another patch soon. "custom
datatype parser" looks premature yet, though we want to give more
feedbacks about its design. I'm not sure about other patches.

> 4 of the patches haven't yet received any review. Jan Urbanski has been
> pretty good about posting updated patches as the dependent patches get
> updated.  It would be good if a few people grabbed these. The individual
> patches tend to not be that large.

I agree he did quite a lot of work well. But still some of the patches
are very easy and others is like WIP stage. I hope anyone can review
them as soon as possible.

Regards,

--
Hitoshi Harada