| From: | Dave Page <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk> |
|---|---|
| To: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Magnus Hagander <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net> |
| Cc: | "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>, John Hansen <john(at)geeknet(dot)com(dot)au>, <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: Infrastructure monitoring |
| Date: | 2006-01-14 20:55:52 |
| Message-ID: | BFEF15D8.3B73%dpage@vale-housing.co.uk |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-www |
On 14/1/06 20:17, "Josh Berkus" <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> wrote:
> People:
>
>> I assume you talk about the nagios monitoring? Or are there perhaps even
>> now multiple sets of monitoring? (Dave has a nagios installation up at
>> least).
>
> For those of you who haven't seen Hyperic, think of Nagios with a fancy web UI
> including notification management, scheduled tasks, historical reporting, and
> specific monitioring tools for PostgreSQL databases and other common
> applications. As a comparison, Nagios::Hyperic --> ed::vi or
> amanda::Arkieka
Which is all very nice but what would any of those features give us that we
have any use for?
Regards, Dave.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2006-01-14 20:59:34 | Re: Infrastructure monitoring |
| Previous Message | Guido Barosio | 2006-01-14 20:43:58 | Re: Infrastructure monitoring |