| From: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Magnus Hagander" <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net> |
| Cc: | "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "John Hansen" <john(at)geeknet(dot)com(dot)au>, pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org, "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: Infrastructure monitoring |
| Date: | 2006-01-14 20:17:12 |
| Message-ID: | 200601141217.12780.josh@agliodbs.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-www |
People:
> I assume you talk about the nagios monitoring? Or are there perhaps even
> now multiple sets of monitoring? (Dave has a nagios installation up at
> least).
For those of you who haven't seen Hyperic, think of Nagios with a fancy web UI
including notification management, scheduled tasks, historical reporting, and
specific monitioring tools for PostgreSQL databases and other common
applications. As a comparison, Nagios::Hyperic --> ed::vi or
amanda::Arkieka
The one hitch there is that all of this functionality would require that
Hyperic have a server to collect data and run the web interface -- it has
substantial resource consumption. Possibly Hyperic LLC would supply this
too, in exchange for a case study, but we'd have to ask them.
--
Josh Berkus
Aglio Database Solutions
San Francisco
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Guido Barosio | 2006-01-14 20:43:58 | Re: Infrastructure monitoring |
| Previous Message | Dave Page | 2006-01-14 19:25:02 | Re: Infrastructure monitoring |