Re: hstore ==> and deprecate =>

From: Michael Glaesemann <grzm(at)seespotcode(dot)net>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: hstore ==> and deprecate =>
Date: 2010-06-08 19:56:11
Message-ID: BF913C50-B91E-4B8E-977E-E1D4381F4603@seespotcode.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


On Jun 8, 2010, at 15:38 , Robert Haas wrote:

> On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 3:34 PM, Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> hm. any chance of a shorter operator, like '#'? I kinda agree that
>> hstore_in and the operator don't have to be the same, but requiring
>> three letter token for the two most high traffic operations w/hstore
>> seems off to me.
>>
>> # is currently used for bitwise xor/geo
>
> I'm happy to do whatever the consensus is. I thought it would be
> easier to remember if the two operators were spelled at least somewhat
> similarly, but I just work here.

Perhaps
->
Would a colon work?

(That's enough bikeshedding for me.)

Michael Glaesemann
grzm seespotcode net

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2010-06-08 20:17:14 Re: hstore ==> and deprecate =>
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2010-06-08 19:54:56 Re: hstore ==> and deprecate =>