Re: hstore ==> and deprecate =>

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Michael Glaesemann <grzm(at)seespotcode(dot)net>
Cc: Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: hstore ==> and deprecate =>
Date: 2010-06-08 20:17:14
Message-ID: AANLkTinAfxpP4Q0btNy6sWSQJf2br3jOEjmeKE2lZAiL@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 3:56 PM, Michael Glaesemann <grzm(at)seespotcode(dot)net> wrote:
> On Jun 8, 2010, at 15:38 , Robert Haas wrote:
>> On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 3:34 PM, Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>>> hm.  any chance of a  shorter operator, like '#'?  I kinda agree that
>>> hstore_in and the operator don't have to be the same, but requiring
>>> three letter token for the two most high traffic operations w/hstore
>>> seems off to me.
>>>
>>> # is currently used for bitwise xor/geo
>>
>> I'm happy to do whatever the consensus is.  I thought it would be
>> easier to remember if the two operators were spelled at least somewhat
>> similarly, but I just work here.
>
> Perhaps
> ->

That's already in use to mean something else.

> Would a colon work?

Nope.

ERROR: syntax error at or near ":"

> (That's enough bikeshedding for me.)

Test first, then post? :-)

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise Postgres Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2010-06-08 20:18:08 Re: [PATCH] Add _PG_init to PL language handler documentation
Previous Message Michael Glaesemann 2010-06-08 19:56:11 Re: hstore ==> and deprecate =>