From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Michael Glaesemann <grzm(at)seespotcode(dot)net> |
Cc: | Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: hstore ==> and deprecate => |
Date: | 2010-06-08 20:17:14 |
Message-ID: | AANLkTinAfxpP4Q0btNy6sWSQJf2br3jOEjmeKE2lZAiL@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 3:56 PM, Michael Glaesemann <grzm(at)seespotcode(dot)net> wrote:
> On Jun 8, 2010, at 15:38 , Robert Haas wrote:
>> On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 3:34 PM, Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>>> hm. any chance of a shorter operator, like '#'? I kinda agree that
>>> hstore_in and the operator don't have to be the same, but requiring
>>> three letter token for the two most high traffic operations w/hstore
>>> seems off to me.
>>>
>>> # is currently used for bitwise xor/geo
>>
>> I'm happy to do whatever the consensus is. I thought it would be
>> easier to remember if the two operators were spelled at least somewhat
>> similarly, but I just work here.
>
> Perhaps
> ->
That's already in use to mean something else.
> Would a colon work?
Nope.
ERROR: syntax error at or near ":"
> (That's enough bikeshedding for me.)
Test first, then post? :-)
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise Postgres Company
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Haas | 2010-06-08 20:18:08 | Re: [PATCH] Add _PG_init to PL language handler documentation |
Previous Message | Michael Glaesemann | 2010-06-08 19:56:11 | Re: hstore ==> and deprecate => |