From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: hstore ==> and deprecate => |
Date: | 2010-06-08 19:54:56 |
Message-ID: | 4C0EA010.3030800@dunslane.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote:
> Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>
>> p.s. I hope so in 9.1 will be complete hstore module marked as deprecated
>>
>
> Really? And replaced with what? And why wouldn't the replacement use
> the same operator names?
>
>
>
Yeah. I'll be looking for throats to cut if that happens. I have several
apps that use it extensively. If anything, I want it brought into core -
it has wide ranging usefulness.
cheers
andrew
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Michael Glaesemann | 2010-06-08 19:56:11 | Re: hstore ==> and deprecate => |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2010-06-08 19:46:06 | Re: How about closing some Open Items? |