Re: Pause/Resume feature for Hot Standby

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Pause/Resume feature for Hot Standby
Date: 2010-05-04 15:33:46
Message-ID: AANLkTinU_4KHeAZBVH4sOQJvLkkpVSxEhvUwT6femmRl@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 11:10 AM, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> This is clearly a response to issues raised about HS and not a new
> feature.

I don't find that clear at all. In fact, I find the exact opposition
position to be clear.

> It's also proposed in the most minimal way possible with
> respect for the current state of release. Why is you think I want to go
> to beta less quickly than anyone else?

We're already in beta. I said nothing about when you want to go to
beta or do anything else.

> There hasn't been anything more than a minor bug in weeks, so not really
> sure how you arrive at that the idea the code needs "stabilising".

I don't agree that there hasn't been anything more than a minor bug in
weeks. I arrive at the idea that the code needs stabilizing on the
basis of the fact that we keep finding new bugs.

> When people complain, I propose solutions. If you then object that the
> proposed solution is actually a new feature, that leaves us in a
> deadlock.

Not really. You're entitled to say what you think we should do and I
am entitled to say what I think we should do. I think we should wait
for 9.1.

...Robert

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Erik Rijkers 2010-05-04 16:10:53 Re: testing HS/SR - 1 vs 2 performance
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2010-05-04 15:27:09 Re: buildfarm building all live branches from git