Re: "Alpha" page unmaingained? Still claims 9.1alpha1 is newest

From: Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>
To: Cédric Villemain <cedric(dot)villemain(dot)debian(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Marti Raudsepp <marti(at)juffo(dot)org>, pgsql-www <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
Subject: Re: "Alpha" page unmaingained? Still claims 9.1alpha1 is newest
Date: 2010-11-05 15:05:47
Message-ID: AANLkTi=86qif6w5B6sU9Yr8Tp7yEVuESqXN_L_UfBRXs@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-www

On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 7:46 AM, Cédric Villemain
<cedric(dot)villemain(dot)debian(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> 2010/11/5 Marti Raudsepp <marti(at)juffo(dot)org>:
>> Hi list,
>
> Hello Marti,
>
>>
>> Apparently nobody is maintaining the postgresql.org "alpha" page as my
>> last email was ignored, but I'll try again regardless.
>
> Your last email wasn't ignored, J.berkus raise new one : '[pgsql-www]
> Please update alpha page'. I hope some of the www-team member will be
> able to update that shortly.

Most of the web team are currently unavailable (or have extremely
limited availability) due to PGWest.

--
Dave Page
Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
Twitter: @pgsnake

EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Devrim GÜNDÜZ 2010-11-05 15:08:02 Re: "Alpha" page unmaingained? Still claims 9.1alpha1 is newest
Previous Message Cédric Villemain 2010-11-05 14:46:57 Re: "Alpha" page unmaingained? Still claims 9.1alpha1 is newest