Re: "Alpha" page unmaingained? Still claims 9.1alpha1 is newest

From: Cédric Villemain <cedric(dot)villemain(dot)debian(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Marti Raudsepp <marti(at)juffo(dot)org>
Cc: pgsql-www <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
Subject: Re: "Alpha" page unmaingained? Still claims 9.1alpha1 is newest
Date: 2010-11-05 14:46:57
Message-ID: AANLkTimTQxOOx4MhhLdkRbaQUBBC439UDrAvMdkk-GZr@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-www

2010/11/5 Marti Raudsepp <marti(at)juffo(dot)org>:
> Hi list,

Hello Marti,

>
> Apparently nobody is maintaining the postgresql.org "alpha" page as my
> last email was ignored, but I'll try again regardless.

Your last email wasn't ignored, J.berkus raise new one : '[pgsql-www]
Please update alpha page'. I hope some of the www-team member will be
able to update that shortly.

thank you for pointing that.
--
Cédric Villemain               2ndQuadrant
http://2ndQuadrant.fr/     PostgreSQL : Expertise, Formation et Support

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dave Page 2010-11-05 15:05:47 Re: "Alpha" page unmaingained? Still claims 9.1alpha1 is newest
Previous Message Marti Raudsepp 2010-11-05 14:00:33 "Alpha" page unmaingained? Still claims 9.1alpha1 is newest