Re: "Alpha" page unmaingained? Still claims 9.1alpha1 is newest

From: Devrim GÜNDÜZ <devrim(at)gunduz(dot)org>
To: Marti Raudsepp <marti(at)juffo(dot)org>
Cc: pgsql-www <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: "Alpha" page unmaingained? Still claims 9.1alpha1 is newest
Date: 2010-11-05 15:08:02
Message-ID: 1288969682.10725.2.camel@hp-laptop02.gunduz.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-www

On Fri, 2010-11-05 at 16:00 +0200, Marti Raudsepp wrote:
>
> Apparently nobody is maintaining the postgresql.org "alpha" page as my
> last email was ignored, but I'll try again regardless.

We are not ignoring you. Majority of website committers are at PgWest
right now.

I'll see whether I can fix it now.
--
Devrim GÜNDÜZ
PostgreSQL Danışmanı/Consultant, Red Hat Certified Engineer
PostgreSQL RPM Repository: http://yum.pgrpms.org
Community: devrim~PostgreSQL.org, devrim.gunduz~linux.org.tr
http://www.gunduz.org Twitter: http://twitter.com/devrimgunduz

In response to

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Devrim GÜNDÜZ 2010-11-05 15:30:48 Re: "Alpha" page unmaingained? Still claims 9.1alpha1 is newest
Previous Message Dave Page 2010-11-05 15:05:47 Re: "Alpha" page unmaingained? Still claims 9.1alpha1 is newest