Re: Possible fails in pg_stat_statements test

From: "Anton A(dot) Melnikov" <aamelnikov(at)inbox(dot)ru>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Possible fails in pg_stat_statements test
Date: 2022-07-09 09:32:27
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 06.07.2022 20:11, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 31, 2022 at 12:00 PM Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>>> Indeed. Then there is a very simple solution for this particular case as
>>> wal_records counter may only sometime becomes greater but never less.
>>> The corresponding patch is attached.
>> +1 for this approach, and the patch looks good to me.
> Committed.

Thanks a lot!

Anton A. Melnikov
Postgres Professional:
The Russian Postgres Company

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dean Rasheed 2022-07-09 10:28:20 Re: Making the subquery alias optional in the FROM clause
Previous Message Thomas Munro 2022-07-09 05:27:31 Re: Compilation issue on Solaris.