Re: Possible fails in pg_stat_statements test

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: "Anton A(dot) Melnikov" <aamelnikov(at)inbox(dot)ru>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Possible fails in pg_stat_statements test
Date: 2022-07-06 17:11:07
Message-ID: CA+TgmoaEXkyRFsEcbfSAkaCnTR-Kmx5jP55m-LpodsQj7XE-2g@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Mar 31, 2022 at 12:00 PM Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > Indeed. Then there is a very simple solution for this particular case as
> > wal_records counter may only sometime becomes greater but never less.
> > The corresponding patch is attached.
>
> +1 for this approach, and the patch looks good to me.

Committed.

--
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2022-07-06 17:17:24 Re: AIX support - alignment issues
Previous Message Nathan Bossart 2022-07-06 16:51:10 Re: O(n) tasks cause lengthy startups and checkpoints