| From: | "Dave Page" <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com |
| Cc: | "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Guillaume Smet" <guillaume(dot)smet(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Merlin Moncure" <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Gregory Stark" <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, "Simon Riggs" <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Recovery Test Framework |
| Date: | 2009-01-12 17:36:43 |
| Message-ID: | 937d27e10901120936g48e691a6mb3e8c2dfa7f81e88@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 5:30 PM, Joshua D. Drake <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-01-12 at 17:27 +0000, Dave Page wrote:
>
>> > In general, we have always regretted it in the past when we chose to
>> > slip a release waiting for a specific feature...
>>
>> I don't recall such a time - though perhaps the last time it happened
>> was before I was so heavily involved in the release process (ie. 7.x).
>> What were the reasons for regretting it?
>
> 8.2 suffered from horrendous slip.
It wasn't delayed for a specific feature though was it? Just because
there was so much in the queue it took far longer than planned. Plus
it was originally intended as a half-length cycle which clearly didn't
work for a number of reasons.
--
Dave Page
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2009-01-12 17:37:44 | Re: Recovery Test Framework |
| Previous Message | Dave Page | 2009-01-12 17:34:25 | Re: Recovery Test Framework |