Re: Recovery Test Framework

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Guillaume Smet <guillaume(dot)smet(at)gmail(dot)com>, Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>, Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Recovery Test Framework
Date: 2009-01-12 17:30:23
Message-ID: 1231781423.30598.29.camel@jd-laptop.pragmaticzealot.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, 2009-01-12 at 17:27 +0000, Dave Page wrote:

> > In general, we have always regretted it in the past when we chose to
> > slip a release waiting for a specific feature...
>
> I don't recall such a time - though perhaps the last time it happened
> was before I was so heavily involved in the release process (ie. 7.x).
> What were the reasons for regretting it?

8.2 suffered from horrendous slip.

Joshua D. Drake

>
--
PostgreSQL
Consulting, Development, Support, Training
503-667-4564 - http://www.commandprompt.com/
The PostgreSQL Company, serving since 1997

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2009-01-12 17:33:43 Re: pgsql: Tweak order of operations in BitmapHeapNext() to avoid the case
Previous Message Dave Page 2009-01-12 17:27:49 Re: Recovery Test Framework