Re: Wrong order of tests in findDependentObjects()

From: Jim Nasby <Jim(dot)Nasby(at)BlueTreble(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Wrong order of tests in findDependentObjects()
Date: 2016-12-01 23:14:36
Message-ID: 91fc28a2-cff7-abb5-08dc-9715f938b55b@BlueTreble.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 12/1/16 1:09 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> I think that the patch I wrote is good cleanup, so I'm still inclined
> to apply it in HEAD, but I no longer think it's fixing any case that's
> significant in the field. I wonder if you have a counterexample?

No; I'm sure I've run into this because of a temp object other than a
table (probably a function, though possibly something else).
--
Jim Nasby, Data Architect, Blue Treble Consulting, Austin TX
Experts in Analytics, Data Architecture and PostgreSQL
Data in Trouble? Get it in Treble! http://BlueTreble.com
855-TREBLE2 (855-873-2532)

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2016-12-01 23:15:54 Re: Mail thread references in commits
Previous Message Tom Lane 2016-12-01 23:12:34 Re: Mail thread references in commits