Re: Let's get rid of serial_schedule

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Let's get rid of serial_schedule
Date: 2021-05-11 19:44:16
Message-ID: 903771.1620762256@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se> writes:
> On 11 May 2021, at 20:58, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> + # for backwards compatibility, interpret "serial" as parallel tests

> This comment may seem odd without reading the commit message. Perhaps it can
> be reworded to "..as parallel tests running with a single worker" or something
> along those lines?

I liked Heikki's phrasing, so the v2 patch does it his way.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2021-05-11 19:46:40 Re: Why do we have perl and sed versions of Gen_dummy_probes?
Previous Message Tom Lane 2021-05-11 19:38:55 Re: Let's get rid of serial_schedule