Re: Let's get rid of serial_schedule

From: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Let's get rid of serial_schedule
Date: 2021-05-11 19:47:22
Message-ID: BC2ADD4F-D25E-49DD-9B63-06CDC9D03F69@yesql.se
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> On 11 May 2021, at 21:44, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>
> Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se> writes:
>> On 11 May 2021, at 20:58, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>>> + # for backwards compatibility, interpret "serial" as parallel tests
>
>> This comment may seem odd without reading the commit message. Perhaps it can
>> be reworded to "..as parallel tests running with a single worker" or something
>> along those lines?
>
> I liked Heikki's phrasing, so the v2 patch does it his way.

Agreed, I like his phrasing too.

--
Daniel Gustafsson https://vmware.com/

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2021-05-11 19:47:45 Re: Why do we have perl and sed versions of Gen_dummy_probes?
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2021-05-11 19:46:40 Re: Why do we have perl and sed versions of Gen_dummy_probes?