Re: pg_dump --with-* options

From: Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>
To: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pg_dump --with-* options
Date: 2025-07-10 17:42:26
Message-ID: 8ce896d1a05040905cc1a3afbc04e94d8e95669a.camel@j-davis.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, 2025-06-18 at 10:21 -0700, Jeff Davis wrote:
>   * reject the combination of an "only" option and a "with" option

There seems to be a rough consensus on this point. Should we move ahead
with this small change and see if we can get consensus to go further?

Regards,
Jeff Davis

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jeff Davis 2025-07-10 17:57:14 Re: pg_dump --with-* options
Previous Message Florents Tselai 2025-07-10 17:41:11 Re: PATCH: jsonpath string methods: lower, upper, initcap, l/r/btrim, replace, split_part