From: | Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: pg_dump --with-* options |
Date: | 2025-07-10 17:57:14 |
Message-ID: | d64d902780ab6f95ea30093b4985d097d7b29605.camel@j-davis.com |
Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, 2025-06-25 at 08:18 +0900, Fujii Masao wrote:
> For pg_dump and pg_dumpall, I agree with Jeff's idea in [1],
> but if the statistics is skipped by default, I don't think
> we need a --no-statistics option. So, here's how I think
> the options should work:
>
> * Keep: --schema-only, --data-only, --statistics-only, --no-
> schema, --no-data, -and -statistics
> * Remove: --no-statistics, --with-schema, and --with-data
...
> For pg_restore, I believe there's agreement to restore statistics
> by default if they exist in the archive. So:
>
> * Keep: --schema-only, --data-only, --statistics-only, --no-
> schema, --no-data, and --no-statistics
> * Remove: --with-schema, --with-data, and --statistics
That means pg_dump will accept --statistics and reject --no-statistics;
and pg_restore will accept --no-statistics and reject --statistics.
Other options are mostly the same between them, so I'm not sure it's a
good idea for them to diverge.
Regards,
Jeff Davis
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2025-07-10 18:08:01 | Re: C11 / VS 2019 |
Previous Message | Jeff Davis | 2025-07-10 17:42:26 | Re: pg_dump --with-* options |