Re: Slightly improve initdb --sync-only option's help message

On 7/23/21, 9:09 AM, "Bossart, Nathan" <bossartn(at)amazon(dot)com> wrote:
> On 7/22/21, 6:31 PM, "Justin Pryzby" <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com> wrote:
>> On Thu, Jul 22, 2021 at 10:32:18PM +0000, Bossart, Nathan wrote:
>>> IMO the note about the option being helpful after using the --no-sync
>>> option would fit better in the docs, but I'm struggling to think of a
>>> use case for using --no-sync and then calling initdb again with
>>> --sync-only. Why wouldn't you just leave out --no-sync the first
>>> time?
>>
>> It's to allow safely running bulk loading with fsync=off - if the bulk load
>> fails, you can wipe out the partially-loaded cluster and start over.
>> But then transitioning to a durable state requires not just setting fsync=on,
>> which enables future fsync calls. It also requires syncing all dirty buffers.
>
> Right. Perhaps the documentation for --sync-only could mention this
> use-case instead.
>
> Safely write all database files to disk and exit. This does
> not perform any of the normal initdb operations. Generally,
> this option is useful for ensuring reliable recovery after
> changing fsync from off to on.

Here are my suggestions in patch form.

Nathan