Re: improved DefElem list processing

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: improved DefElem list processing
Date: 2016-08-04 18:21:01
Message-ID: 8840.1470334861@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

I wrote:
> Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
>> The other adds a location field to the DefElem node.

> +1 for sure, lots of places where that would be a good thing
> (the duplicate check itself, for starters).

Forgot to mention: seems like you should have added a location
argument to makeDefElem.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Claudio Freire 2016-08-04 18:23:10 Re: Heap WARM Tuples - Design Draft
Previous Message Andres Freund 2016-08-04 18:20:37 Re: Pgbench performance tuning?