Re: improved DefElem list processing

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: improved DefElem list processing
Date: 2016-08-05 15:25:34
Message-ID: 3a05647c-a5d9-ab5a-43a6-daf8159c597a@2ndquadrant.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 8/4/16 2:21 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Forgot to mention: seems like you should have added a location
> argument to makeDefElem.

I was hesitating to do that lest it break extensions or something, but I
guess we break bigger things than that all the time. I'll change it.

--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Claudio Freire 2016-08-05 15:25:39 Re: Heap WARM Tuples - Design Draft
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2016-08-05 15:24:45 Re: improved DefElem list processing