Re: transition table behavior with inheritance appears broken

From: Andrew Gierth <andrew(at)tao11(dot)riddles(dot)org(dot)uk>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Kevin Grittner <kgrittn(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, Rajkumar Raghuwanshi <rajkumar(dot)raghuwanshi(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: transition table behavior with inheritance appears broken
Date: 2017-06-18 22:59:43
Message-ID: 874lvcrjn0.fsf@news-spur.riddles.org.uk
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

>>>>> "Andrew" == Andrew Gierth <andrew(at)tao11(dot)riddles(dot)org(dot)uk> writes:

Andrew> Unfortunately I've been delayed over the past couple of days,
Andrew> but I have Thomas' latest patchset in hand and will be working
Andrew> on it over the rest of the week. Status update by 23:59 BST on
Andrew> Sun 18th, by which time I hope to have everything finalized
Andrew> (all three issues, not just the inheritance one).

I have, I believe, completed my review of the patchset. My conclusion is
that the fix appears to be sound and I haven't been able to find any
further issues with it; so I think Thomas's patches should be committed
as-is. Unless anyone objects I will do this within the next few days.

(Any preferences for whether it should be one commit or 3 separate ones?)

--
Andrew (irc:RhodiumToad)

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Gierth 2017-06-18 23:04:04 Re: Transition tables vs ON CONFLICT
Previous Message Thomas Munro 2017-06-18 22:28:11 Re: Decimal64 and Decimal128