Re: Transition tables vs ON CONFLICT

From: Andrew Gierth <andrew(at)tao11(dot)riddles(dot)org(dot)uk>
To: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: Kevin Grittner <kgrittn(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>, Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Marko Tiikkaja <marko(at)joh(dot)to>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Transition tables vs ON CONFLICT
Date: 2017-06-18 23:04:04
Message-ID: 87zid4q4qb.fsf@news-spur.riddles.org.uk
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

>>>>> "Thomas" == Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> writes:

Thomas> That accidentally removed a comment that I wanted to keep.
Thomas> Here is a better version.

I plan to commit this soon; if anyone has any comment to make, now would
be a good time.

--
Andrew (irc:RhodiumToad)

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Gierth 2017-06-18 23:06:15 Re: PG10 transition tables, wCTEs and multiple operations on the same table
Previous Message Andrew Gierth 2017-06-18 22:59:43 Re: transition table behavior with inheritance appears broken