Re: transition table behavior with inheritance appears broken

From: Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>
To: Andrew Gierth <andrew(at)tao11(dot)riddles(dot)org(dot)uk>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Kevin Grittner <kgrittn(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, Rajkumar Raghuwanshi <rajkumar(dot)raghuwanshi(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: transition table behavior with inheritance appears broken
Date: 2017-06-23 01:43:00
Message-ID: 20170623014300.GB1603932@rfd.leadboat.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sun, Jun 18, 2017 at 11:59:43PM +0100, Andrew Gierth wrote:
> >>>>> "Andrew" == Andrew Gierth <andrew(at)tao11(dot)riddles(dot)org(dot)uk> writes:
>
> Andrew> Unfortunately I've been delayed over the past couple of days,
> Andrew> but I have Thomas' latest patchset in hand and will be working
> Andrew> on it over the rest of the week. Status update by 23:59 BST on
> Andrew> Sun 18th, by which time I hope to have everything finalized
> Andrew> (all three issues, not just the inheritance one).
>
> I have, I believe, completed my review of the patchset. My conclusion is
> that the fix appears to be sound and I haven't been able to find any
> further issues with it; so I think Thomas's patches should be committed
> as-is. Unless anyone objects I will do this within the next few days.
>
> (Any preferences for whether it should be one commit or 3 separate ones?)

This PostgreSQL 10 open item is past due for your status update. Kindly send
a status update within 24 hours, and include a date for your subsequent status
update. Refer to the policy on open item ownership:
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20170404140717.GA2675809%40tornado.leadboat.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2017-06-23 01:56:07 Re: Fast promotion not used when doing a recovery_target PITR restore?
Previous Message Tom Lane 2017-06-23 01:36:38 ICU non-utf8 code path leaks memory like there's no tomorrow