| From: | Jennifer Trey <jennifer(dot)trey(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | |
| Cc: | jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com, Ashish Karalkar <ashishka(at)synechron(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: PostgreSql with or without Plus? |
| Date: | 2009-03-30 19:20:24 |
| Message-ID: | 863606ec0903301220o6c0776f6qb97b8dbd3b0b179@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
Hmm, cant find it.. but.. if I install the regular (not plus), could I later
upgrade easily to other versions ? Is that possible? In that case I could
just start with the one I already are familiar with.
Jen
On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 9:03 PM, Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 7:36 PM, Jennifer Trey <jennifer(dot)trey(at)gmail(dot)com>
> wrote:
> > I am sorry, but it seems that I replied to only one of you instead of to
> the
> > mailing list.
> > I am just about to install a version on my "Server computer" (Windows web
> > server 2008 x64) and I am stuck on what I should go with.
> > I have been developing on the standard postgreSQL but like that the
> > EnterpriseDB webpage claims that "Standard Plus" is faster.
>
> Where does it claim that? Standard Server is pure community
> PostgreSQL, with a bunch of extra stuff in the installer.
>
>
> --
> Dave Page
> EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
>
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Dave Page | 2009-03-30 19:24:47 | Re: PostgreSql with or without Plus? |
| Previous Message | Sam Mason | 2009-03-30 19:18:51 | Re: [GENEAL] dynamically changing table |