Re: [GENEAL] dynamically changing table

From: Sam Mason <sam(at)samason(dot)me(dot)uk>
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [GENEAL] dynamically changing table
Date: 2009-03-30 19:18:51
Message-ID: 20090330191851.GZ12225@frubble.xen.chris-lamb.co.uk
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 08:50:59PM +0200, A B wrote:
> Well, the requirement is: keep a lot of data stored, don't loose any
> of it, and you will not know what you will have to store (changing
> number of fields and of different types)

As you've not said anything about getting said data back; it doesn't
seem to matter if it actually gets lost! Sounds as though the main
unanswered constraint on the database at the moment is what people what
to do with the data once they've handed it to you. When you've figured
that out you may have a better idea of what to do.

--
Sam http://samason.me.uk/

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jennifer Trey 2009-03-30 19:20:24 Re: PostgreSql with or without Plus?
Previous Message Will Rutherdale (rutherw) 2009-03-30 19:17:54 Re: [GENEAL] dynamically changing table