| From: | Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Jennifer Trey <jennifer(dot)trey(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com, Ashish Karalkar <ashishka(at)synechron(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: PostgreSql with or without Plus? |
| Date: | 2009-03-30 19:03:35 |
| Message-ID: | 937d27e10903301203j1b2f4105q4c9b990f5e55ab22@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 7:36 PM, Jennifer Trey <jennifer(dot)trey(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> I am sorry, but it seems that I replied to only one of you instead of to the
> mailing list.
> I am just about to install a version on my "Server computer" (Windows web
> server 2008 x64) and I am stuck on what I should go with.
> I have been developing on the standard postgreSQL but like that the
> EnterpriseDB webpage claims that "Standard Plus" is faster.
Where does it claim that? Standard Server is pure community
PostgreSQL, with a bunch of extra stuff in the installer.
--
Dave Page
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Sam Mason | 2009-03-30 19:08:37 | Re: [GENEAL] dynamically changing table |
| Previous Message | Andrej | 2009-03-30 19:03:06 | Re: [GENEAL] dynamically changing table |