| From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)kurilemu(dot)de>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>, Nazir Bilal Yavuz <byavuz81(at)gmail(dot)com>, Florents Tselai <florents(dot)tselai(at)gmail(dot)com>, Euler Taveira <euler(at)eulerto(dot)com>, jian he <jian(dot)universality(at)gmail(dot)com>, "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>, Corey Huinker <corey(dot)huinker(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: split func.sgml to separated individual sgml files |
| Date: | 2025-10-07 18:39:44 |
| Message-ID: | 84fc5fed-9cfb-4275-92fc-6e148d95b0f7@dunslane.net |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2025-10-06 Mo 12:00 PM, Álvaro Herrera wrote:
> On 2025-Oct-03, Tom Lane wrote:
>
>> Would it be unreasonable to discard the "check" target altogether?
>> It made sense back in the day when actually building the html docs
>> took many minutes. But I haven't used it in years, so I wonder
>> if anyone else has either.
> I wouldn't particularly appreciate that. Doing "make check" takes 0.6
> seconds for me, while the HTML build is 28 seconds. It's quite a
> difference.
>
OK, so I think that one's not going to fly. We could keep the check
target and also run the checks as part of building postgres-full.sgml.
It's less clear to me how to do that in meson, though, since you can
only have a single command in a custom target.
cheers
andrew
--
Andrew Dunstan
EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2025-10-07 18:46:42 | Re: split func.sgml to separated individual sgml files |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2025-10-07 18:14:50 | Re: Optimize LISTEN/NOTIFY |