| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)kurilemu(dot)de>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>, Nazir Bilal Yavuz <byavuz81(at)gmail(dot)com>, Florents Tselai <florents(dot)tselai(at)gmail(dot)com>, Euler Taveira <euler(at)eulerto(dot)com>, jian he <jian(dot)universality(at)gmail(dot)com>, "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>, Corey Huinker <corey(dot)huinker(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: split func.sgml to separated individual sgml files |
| Date: | 2025-10-07 18:46:42 |
| Message-ID: | 2499087.1759862802@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
> OK, so I think that one's not going to fly. We could keep the check
> target and also run the checks as part of building postgres-full.sgml.
Works for me.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andres Freund | 2025-10-07 18:47:17 | Re: split func.sgml to separated individual sgml files |
| Previous Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2025-10-07 18:39:44 | Re: split func.sgml to separated individual sgml files |