| From: | Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)kurilemu(dot)de> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>, Nazir Bilal Yavuz <byavuz81(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Florents Tselai <florents(dot)tselai(at)gmail(dot)com>, Euler Taveira <euler(at)eulerto(dot)com>, jian he <jian(dot)universality(at)gmail(dot)com>, "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>, Corey Huinker <corey(dot)huinker(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: split func.sgml to separated individual sgml files |
| Date: | 2025-10-06 16:00:46 |
| Message-ID: | 202510061555.3v5t54e6eib3@alvherre.pgsql |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2025-Oct-03, Tom Lane wrote:
> Would it be unreasonable to discard the "check" target altogether?
> It made sense back in the day when actually building the html docs
> took many minutes. But I haven't used it in years, so I wonder
> if anyone else has either.
I wouldn't particularly appreciate that. Doing "make check" takes 0.6
seconds for me, while the HTML build is 28 seconds. It's quite a
difference.
--
Álvaro Herrera 48°01'N 7°57'E — https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/
"This is a foot just waiting to be shot" (Andrew Dunstan)
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andres Freund | 2025-10-06 16:08:56 | Re: Should we update the random_page_cost default value? |
| Previous Message | Vitaly Davydov | 2025-10-06 15:46:10 | RE: Newly created replication slot may be invalidated by checkpoint |