Re: Should we improve "PID XXXX is not a PostgreSQL server process" warning for pg_terminate_backend(<<postmaster_pid>>)?

From: "Bossart, Nathan" <bossartn(at)amazon(dot)com>
To: Bharath Rupireddy <bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Euler Taveira <euler(at)eulerto(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Should we improve "PID XXXX is not a PostgreSQL server process" warning for pg_terminate_backend(<<postmaster_pid>>)?
Date: 2021-12-08 03:51:48
Message-ID: 82C5CC71-A60F-44B9-BA60-DDBC9A43B79E@amazon.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 12/7/21, 5:21 PM, "Bharath Rupireddy" <bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 8, 2021 at 4:17 AM Bossart, Nathan <bossartn(at)amazon(dot)com> wrote:
>> I agree with Tom. I would just s/server/backend/ (as per the
>> attached) and call it a day.
>
> Thanks. v5 patch looks good to me.

I've marked the commitfest entry as ready-for-committer.

Nathan

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Smith 2021-12-08 04:09:02 Re: parse_subscription_options - suggested improvements
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2021-12-08 03:51:12 Re: parse_subscription_options - suggested improvements