Re: parse_subscription_options - suggested improvements

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: "Bossart, Nathan" <bossartn(at)amazon(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: parse_subscription_options - suggested improvements
Date: 2021-12-08 03:51:12
Message-ID: YbArsAxmjcCnl1n/@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Dec 07, 2021 at 08:12:59AM +1100, Peter Smith wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 7, 2021 at 6:07 AM Bossart, Nathan <bossartn(at)amazon(dot)com> wrote:
>> Attached a v14 with the initializations added back.
>
> LGTM.

All the code paths previously covered still are, so applied this one.
Thanks!
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bossart, Nathan 2021-12-08 03:51:48 Re: Should we improve "PID XXXX is not a PostgreSQL server process" warning for pg_terminate_backend(<<postmaster_pid>>)?
Previous Message Tomas Vondra 2021-12-08 03:26:28 Re: 回复：Re: Is it worth pushing conditions to sublink/subplan?