Re: Should we improve "PID XXXX is not a PostgreSQL server process" warning for pg_terminate_backend(<<postmaster_pid>>)?

From: Bharath Rupireddy <bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "Bossart, Nathan" <bossartn(at)amazon(dot)com>
Cc: Euler Taveira <euler(at)eulerto(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Should we improve "PID XXXX is not a PostgreSQL server process" warning for pg_terminate_backend(<<postmaster_pid>>)?
Date: 2021-12-08 01:20:46
Message-ID: CALj2ACUOd9pWbGu2vJKCv8U1rfmPS9W8BqxwJ5KBM8BJWwKX0A@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Dec 8, 2021 at 4:17 AM Bossart, Nathan <bossartn(at)amazon(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On 11/18/21, 8:27 PM, "Bharath Rupireddy" <bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > Here's the v4 patch with the above changes, the output looks like [1].
> > Please review it further.
>
> I agree with Tom. I would just s/server/backend/ (as per the
> attached) and call it a day.

Thanks. v5 patch looks good to me.

Regards,
Bharath Rupireddy.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bharath Rupireddy 2021-12-08 01:54:34 Re: Is there a way (except from server logs) to know the kind of on-going/last checkpoint?
Previous Message Bharath Rupireddy 2021-12-08 01:20:36 Re: Is it correct to update db state in control file as "shutting down" during end-of-recovery checkpoint?