Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: blatantly a bug in the documentation

From: Dimitri Fontaine <dfontaine(at)hi-media(dot)com>
To: Ron Mayer <rm_pg(at)cheapcomplexdevices(dot)com>
Cc: "Stephen R(dot) van den Berg" <srb(at)cuci(dot)nl>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: blatantly a bug in the documentation
Date: 2008-11-25 20:56:42
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Hash: SHA1


Le 25 nov. 08 à 20:29, Ron Mayer a écrit :
> psql=# install module sampledb;
> Downloading sampledb from pgfoundry...
> Installing sampledb....
> Connecting to sampledb....
> sampledb=#

This could be part of an installer for PostgreSQL extensions. See  
following email for a proposal on how to deal with extension packaging:

The proposal purposefully let fetching and building steps out of the  
database manager itself, and makes it so that building is to be cared  
about by distributors. So it would be something like:
   create sampledb
   pg_pkg fetch pgsampledb

and either
   pg_pkg install pgsampledb sampledb
   psql sampledb
   psql sampledb
   sampledb=# install package pgsampledb;

> it'd remove the need for pre-installing a rarely-needed ad-on,
> as well as being useful for other projects.  For exmaple:
>  psql=# install module US_Census_Tiger_Maps;
>  Installing dependency Postgis...
>  Installing module US_Census_Tiger_Maps....
> to install a GIS system with all the road networks.

The dependancy system is yet to be though about, but definitely in the  
scope of the extension manager.

While at it, calling all those things extensions rather than package  
would probably help not confusing people with Oracle compatibility  
etc. Last time I checked I didn't find mention of "package" into the  
standard, but still.

So PosgtreSQL could have an extension manager at SQL level (create or  
replace extension, install extension, or maybe load extension (which  
would LOAD the modules associated), etc) with a system command line  
tool to fetch & build, etc (pg_ext ?) that source level users and  
packagers (distributors) would use?

What do you dear readers think about the "extension" vocabulary?

- --

Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (Darwin)


In response to


pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Gregory StarkDate: 2008-11-25 20:58:45
Subject: Re: Enhancement to pg_dump
Previous:From: Rob KirkbrideDate: 2008-11-25 20:55:32
Subject: Re: Enhancement to pg_dump

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group