Re: blatantly a bug in the documentation

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Dimitri Fontaine <dfontaine(at)hi-media(dot)com>
Cc: Ron Mayer <rm_pg(at)cheapcomplexdevices(dot)com>, "Stephen R(dot) van den Berg" <srb(at)cuci(dot)nl>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: blatantly a bug in the documentation
Date: 2008-11-25 21:46:39
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Dimitri Fontaine <dfontaine(at)hi-media(dot)com> writes:
> What do you dear readers think about the "extension" vocabulary?

+1 ... we should stay away from "package" unless we are going to
implement an Oracle-compatible facility. Which I don't particularly
wish to do, but we should leave it open for the future.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2008-11-25 22:32:11 Re: [Fwd: error compiling postgresql with fedora mingw]
Previous Message Decibel! 2008-11-25 21:10:30 Re: Column reordering in pg_dump