Re: Enhancement to pg_dump

From: "Rob Kirkbride" <rob(dot)kirkbride(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "Dave Page" <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Enhancement to pg_dump
Date: 2008-11-25 20:55:32
Message-ID: e0b3cb2b0811251255x2d3ecb3fn50f1b51288d57428@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Dave,

Ok thanks. Yes, we've got over 1/2 billion rows in one of our tables which
is interesting!

Will post back soon.

Rob

2008/11/25 Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>

> On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 8:39 PM, Rob Kirkbride <rob(dot)kirkbride(at)gmail(dot)com>
> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm very new to hacking postgresql but am using on a very big site
> > (http://ojp.nationalrail.co.uk). One of the issues that we have is
> moving
> > data from a live database to a reports one. I've hacked an extra option
> to
> > pg_dump to delete from tables rather than dropping them.
>
> National Rail use Postgres for their journey planner? Cool :-)
>
> > Once I'm happy with it (I'm a bit rusty at C!), do I post the patch here?
>
> Yes (and please add details to
> http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/CommitFestOpen so it doesn't get
> lost), but please note that we're in the middle of the final phase of
> the development cycle at the moment, so new patches are unlikely to be
> looked at for at least a couple of months.
>
>
> --
> Dave Page
> EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
>

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dimitri Fontaine 2008-11-25 20:56:42 Re: blatantly a bug in the documentation
Previous Message Dave Page 2008-11-25 20:49:56 Re: Enhancement to pg_dump