Re: buildfarm + meson

On 2023-03-09 Th 14:47, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>
>
> On 2023-03-09 Th 08:28, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> At this stage I think I'm prepared to turn this loose on a couple of
>> my buildfarm animals, and if nothing goes awry for the remainder of
>> the month merge the dev/meson branch and push a new release.
>>
>> There is still probably a little polishing to do, especially w.r.t.
>> log file artefacts.
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> A few things I've found:
>
> . We don't appear to have an equivalent of the headerscheck and
> cpluspluscheck GNUmakefile targets
>
> . I don't know how to build other docs targets (e.g. postgres-US.pdf)
>
> . There appears to be some mismatch in database names (e.g.
> regression_dblink vs contrib_regression_dblink). That's going to cause
> some issues with the module that adjusts things for cross version upgrade.
>
>
>

Another thing: the test for uuid.h is too strict. On Fedora 36 the OSSP
header is in /usr/include, not /usr/include/ossp (I got around that for
now by symlinking it, but obviously that's a nasty hack we can't ask
people to do)

cheers

andrew

--
Andrew Dunstan
EDB:https://www.enterprisedb.com