Re: buildfarm + meson

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: buildfarm + meson
Date: 2023-03-09 19:47:36
Message-ID: 124b4492-e4c9-2f7d-cd54-de09c05dbde5@dunslane.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


On 2023-03-09 Th 08:28, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>
>
>
> At this stage I think I'm prepared to turn this loose on a couple of
> my buildfarm animals, and if nothing goes awry for the remainder of
> the month merge the dev/meson branch and push a new release.
>
> There is still probably a little polishing to do, especially w.r.t.
> log file artefacts.
>
>
>

A few things I've found:

. We don't appear to have an equivalent of the headerscheck and
cpluspluscheck GNUmakefile targets

. I don't know how to build other docs targets (e.g. postgres-US.pdf)

. There appears to be some mismatch in database names (e.g.
regression_dblink vs contrib_regression_dblink). That's going to cause
some issues with the module that adjusts things for cross version upgrade.

cheers

andrew

--
Andrew Dunstan
EDB:https://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Stephen Frost 2023-03-09 19:48:09 Re: Disable rdns for Kerberos tests
Previous Message Nathan Bossart 2023-03-09 19:46:08 Re: Improve logging when using Huge Pages