Re: Maximum password length

From: "Bossart, Nathan" <bossartn(at)amazon(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Alexander Kukushkin <cyberdemn(at)gmail(dot)com>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, "isaac(dot)morland(at)gmail(dot)com" <isaac(dot)morland(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Maximum password length
Date: 2020-09-03 21:28:49
Message-ID: 7C7E479C-043A-4D88-9EDB-168EE3E7A691@amazon.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 9/3/20, 2:14 PM, "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> If you insist, I'll change it, but it seems even less likely to ever
> matter to anybody than the changes to make simple_prompt accept
> indefinitely long passwords. (Perhaps a reasonable compromise
> is to extend this comment to note that we're also not bothering
> to support indefinitely long passwords.)

I don't feel strongly about this. A comment in the code seems
reasonable.

Nathan

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2020-09-03 21:29:35 Re: Parallel worker hangs while handling errors.
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2020-09-03 21:28:03 Re: default partition and concurrent attach partition