Re: Recovering from detoast-related catcache invalidations

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Cc: Alexander Lakhin <exclusion(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Recovering from detoast-related catcache invalidations
Date: 2023-11-17 20:35:52
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

I wrote:
> In bug #18163 [1], Alexander proved the misgivings I had in [2]
> about catcache detoasting being possibly unsafe:
> ...
> Attached is a POC patch for fixing this.

The cfbot pointed out that this needed a rebase. No substantive

regards, tom lane

Attachment Content-Type Size
v2-fix-stale-catcache-entries.patch text/x-diff 7.6 KB

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2023-11-17 20:44:41 Re: ResourceOwner refactoring
Previous Message Tom Lane 2023-11-17 20:18:57 Re: should check collations when creating partitioned index