| From: | Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at> |
|---|---|
| To: | Yong Huang <yong321(at)yahoo(dot)com>, pgsql-docs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
| Subject: | Re: postmaster.pid also contains shared memory key |
| Date: | 2026-11-01 12:44:00 |
| Message-ID: | 753efd2b298df13383b4c57a57d965baac64aae7.camel@cybertec.at |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-docs |
On Sun, 2026-11-01 at 01:56 +0000, Yong Huang wrote:
> On Friday, October 30, 2026 at 07:21:41 PM CDT, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 27, 2026 at 08:56:24PM +0000, PG Doc comments form wrote:
> > > On this page, postmaster.pid is said to contain "shared memory segment ID".
> > > It would be better to say "shared memory segment key and ID". The second
> > > last line has two numbers, which are the shared memory segment key (in
> > > decimal instead of hex) and ID, respectively. This can be verified with
> > > `ipcs -m'. If you only say "ID", readers may ask, Which one is the ID?
> >
> > Would you like to write a patch?
>
> The proposed change is too trivial. I just want to inform the documentation team.
> Most readers won't care anyway. Thank you!
Nothing is too trivial. I do care - here is a patch.
Yours,
Laurenz Albe
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| v1-0001-Improve-documentation-for-postmaster.pid.patch | text/x-patch | 1.2 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Fujii Masao | 2026-11-01 15:35:50 | Re: routine_sequence_usage column is named sequence_catalog, not schema_catalog |
| Previous Message | Yong Huang | 2026-11-01 01:56:52 | Re: postmaster.pid also contains shared memory key |