| From: | Yong Huang <yong321(at)yahoo(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-docs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
| Subject: | Re: postmaster.pid also contains shared memory key |
| Date: | 2026-11-01 01:56:52 |
| Message-ID: | 662111745.874151.1793498212565@mail.yahoo.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-docs |
Hi Michael,
The proposed change is too trivial. I just want to inform the documentation team. Most readers won't care anyway. Thank you!
Yong Huang
On Friday, October 30, 2026 at 07:21:41 PM CDT, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> wrote:
On Tue, Oct 27, 2026 at 08:56:24PM +0000, PG Doc comments form wrote:
> On this page, postmaster.pid is said to contain "shared memory segment ID".
> It would be better to say "shared memory segment key and ID". The second
> last line has two numbers, which are the shared memory segment key (in
> decimal instead of hex) and ID, respectively. This can be verified with
> `ipcs -m'. If you only say "ID", readers may ask, Which one is the ID?
Would you like to write a patch?
--
Michael
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Laurenz Albe | 2026-11-01 12:44:00 | Re: postmaster.pid also contains shared memory key |
| Previous Message | PG Doc comments form | 2026-10-31 06:56:18 | routine_sequence_usage column is named sequence_catalog, not schema_catalog |