| From: | Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se> |
|---|---|
| To: | Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at> |
| Cc: | Yong Huang <yong321(at)yahoo(dot)com>, pgsql-docs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
| Subject: | Re: postmaster.pid also contains shared memory key |
| Date: | 2026-11-01 19:16:05 |
| Message-ID: | 0E3C7644-8184-4515-8C0A-139A87E22758@yesql.se |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-docs |
> On 1 Nov 2026, at 13:44, Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at> wrote:
>
> On Sun, 2026-11-01 at 01:56 +0000, Yong Huang wrote:
>> On Friday, October 30, 2026 at 07:21:41 PM CDT, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> wrote:
>>> On Tue, Oct 27, 2026 at 08:56:24PM +0000, PG Doc comments form wrote:
>>>> On this page, postmaster.pid is said to contain "shared memory segment ID".
>>>> It would be better to say "shared memory segment key and ID". The second
>>>> last line has two numbers, which are the shared memory segment key (in
>>>> decimal instead of hex) and ID, respectively. This can be verified with
>>>> `ipcs -m'. If you only say "ID", readers may ask, Which one is the ID?
>>>
>>> Would you like to write a patch?
>>
>> The proposed change is too trivial. I just want to inform the documentation team.
>> Most readers won't care anyway. Thank you!
>
> Nothing is too trivial. I do care - here is a patch.
Pushed, thanks.
--
Daniel Gustafsson
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Fujii Masao | 2026-11-02 00:21:34 | Re: postmaster.pid also contains shared memory key |
| Previous Message | Fujii Masao | 2026-11-01 17:50:56 | Re: Documented parameter names differ from callable proargnames for several built-ins |