On Mar 9, 2007, at 6:42 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
>> Now regarding your restartable vacuum work. I think that stopping a
>> vacuum at some point and being able to restart it later is very
>> cool and
>> may get you some hot chicks, but I'm not sure it's really useful.
>
> Too true :-(
Yeah.
Wouldn't 'divide and conquer' kinda approach make it better ? Ie. let
vacuum to work on some part of table/db. Than stop, pick up another
part later, vacuum it, etc, etc ?
--
Grzegorz Jaskiewicz
gj(at)pointblue(dot)com(dot)pl