| From: | "Zeugswetter Andreas ADI SD" <ZeugswetterA(at)spardat(dot)at> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <jim(at)nasby(dot)net>, "NikhilS" <nikkhils(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "Jim Nasby" <decibel(at)decibel(dot)org>, "Shane Ambler" <pgsql(at)sheeky(dot)biz>, "Peter Eisentraut" <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Auto creation of Partitions |
| Date: | 2007-03-09 09:31:27 |
| Message-ID: | E1539E0ED7043848906A8FF995BDA57901D42FD2@m0143.s-mxs.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
> > Since partition is inheritance-based, a simple DROP or "NO
> INHERIT"
> > will do the job to deal with the partition. Do we want to reinvent
> > additional syntax when these are around and are documented?
>
> Well, if the syntax for adding a new partition eventually
> ends up as ALTER TABLE ADD PARTITION, then it would make more
> sense that you remove a partition via ALTER TABLE DROP PARTITION.
But DROP PARTITION usually moves the data from this partition to other
partitions,
so it is something different.
Andreas
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Cao Yu | 2007-03-09 09:38:07 | A naive question about the Makefile |
| Previous Message | Grzegorz Jaskiewicz | 2007-03-09 08:39:00 | Re: RFC: changing autovacuum_naptime semantics |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2007-03-09 10:21:00 | Re: suggestion for improving TMPDIR and "--format" docs for pg_dump |
| Previous Message | NikhilS | 2007-03-09 06:29:17 | Re: log_autovacuum |