Re: split func.sgml to separated individual sgml files

On 2025-09-01 Mo 11:44 AM, Florents Tselai wrote:
>
>
>> On 1 Sep 2025, at 4:35 PM, Euler Taveira <euler(at)eulerto(dot)com> wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Sep 1, 2025, at 7:35 AM, Florents Tselai wrote:
>>> While working on this https://commitfest.postgresql.org/patch/6020/
>>> I discovered that when changing for func/func-aggregate.sgml, the HTML
>>> wasn’t marked for update.
>>>
>>> IIUC the doc/Makefile should be updated as attached, right ?
>>>
>>
>> Good catch.
>>
>> However, your patch doesn't fix all issues. The check target
>> (check-tabs and
>> check-nbsp) is broken; these targets should also include the func files.
>>
>
> Ah, you’re right, but then again,  I’d expect ALL_SGML to be used
> consistently, but it isn't and I didn't check.
> v3 does that.
> Note that GENERATED_SGML where'te included in these two targets but I
> think there's no harm in checking them too.
>
>
>

Do we actually care about those? I don't want to add needless cycles
anywhere. I note that the meson.build doesn't appear to have a check
target at all, or anything that looks for hard tabs or nbsps.Those
checks were added to the Makefile back in October in commit 5b7da5c261d,
but that got missed even though Daniel had mentioned it in the
discussion thread.[1]

cheers

andrew

[1]
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/F7102912-0BDA-42A3-BDCF-8A4CBD1CC688%40yesql.se

--
Andrew Dunstan
EDB:https://www.enterprisedb.com