| From: | "Magnus Hagander" <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Cc: | "Nicolai Tufar" <ntufar(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Bruce Momjian" <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Subject: | snprintf causes regression tests to fail |
| Date: | 2005-02-27 18:07:16 |
| Message-ID: | 6BCB9D8A16AC4241919521715F4D8BCE4769E1@algol.sollentuna.se |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-hackers-win32 pgsql-patches |
Hi!
The new snpritnf code appears not to deal with 64-bit ints. I'm getting
failures on win32 for int8 as well as all the time related tests (win32
uses int8 for tinmestamps). Removing the snprintf code and falling back
to the OS code makes everything pass again.
I would guess this affects int8 etc on other platforms as well (assuming
they use our snprintf and not the libc one), but I haven't checked it.
//Magnus
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Dave Page | 2005-02-27 19:52:00 | Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] win32 performance - fsync question |
| Previous Message | Michael Paesold | 2005-02-27 13:46:06 | Re: win32 performance - fsync question |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Dave Page | 2005-02-27 19:52:00 | Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] win32 performance - fsync question |
| Previous Message | Michael Paesold | 2005-02-27 13:46:06 | Re: win32 performance - fsync question |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Thomas Hallgren | 2005-02-27 18:19:22 | Patch that deals with that AtCommit_Portals encounters deleted entries |
| Previous Message | Magnus Hagander | 2005-02-27 17:37:24 | win32 libpq build broken |