| From: | Nicolai Tufar <ntufar(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Magnus Hagander <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Subject: | Re: snprintf causes regression tests to fail |
| Date: | 2005-02-28 13:27:14 |
| Message-ID: | d809293905022805272332bc49@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-hackers-win32 pgsql-patches |
Linux and Solaris 10 x86 pass regression tests fine when I force the use of new
snprintf(). The problem should be win32 - specific. I will
investigate it throughly
tonight. Can someone experienced in win32 what can possibly be the problem?
Nick
On Sun, 27 Feb 2005 19:07:16 +0100, Magnus Hagander <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net> wrote:
> Hi!
>
> The new snpritnf code appears not to deal with 64-bit ints. I'm getting
> failures on win32 for int8 as well as all the time related tests (win32
> uses int8 for tinmestamps). Removing the snprintf code and falling back
> to the OS code makes everything pass again.
>
> I would guess this affects int8 etc on other platforms as well (assuming
> they use our snprintf and not the libc one), but I haven't checked it.
>
> //Magnus
>
>
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Oleg Bartunov | 2005-02-28 14:17:07 | Re: serial as FK ? |
| Previous Message | Simone Brunozzi | 2005-02-28 10:34:04 | Re: [HACKERS] Development Plans |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2005-02-28 14:17:20 | Re: snprintf causes regression tests to fail |
| Previous Message | Merlin Moncure | 2005-02-28 13:16:53 | Re: [HACKERS] win32 performance - fsync question |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2005-02-28 14:16:34 | Re: snprintf.c on win32 does not compile.. |
| Previous Message | Magnus Hagander | 2005-02-28 11:40:58 | Re: snprintf.c on win32 does not compile.. |