Re: remove partColsUpdated

From: Chao Li <li(dot)evan(dot)chao(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: remove partColsUpdated
Date: 2025-10-15 23:52:09
Message-ID: 6A9F3EEE-290C-4E51-8F41-12C302C6FB26@gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


> On Oct 15, 2025, at 23:50, Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> This was first added in commit 2f17844 (v11), and AFAICT it was only used
> for a variable named update_tuple_routing_needed in ExecInitModifyTable(),
> which was removed by commit c5b7ba4 (v14). Any objections to removing it
> now?
>
> --
> nathan
> <v1-0001-remove-partColsUpdated.patch>

Looks like this is only one assignment to it and nobody reads it. I don’t see a reason to retain it. Maybe back patch through 14?

I tried to build, and “make check” with this patch, and everything looks good.

Best regards,
--
Chao Li (Evan)
HighGo Software Co., Ltd.
https://www.highgo.com/

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Smith 2025-10-16 00:05:58 Should we say "wal_level = logical" instead of "wal_level >= logical"
Previous Message Tom Lane 2025-10-15 23:39:03 Re: Instability of phycodorus in pg_upgrade tests with JIT